The first national Muslim party in the Netherlands is now a fact.
The Supreme Court’s ruling is eerily similar to an international blasphemy law being promoted by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, a bloc of 57 Muslim countries dedicated to implementing a worldwide ban on “negative stereotyping of Islam.”
Firasat’s lawyers say that they have presented the court with irrefutable evidence that the charges against Firasat were fabricated by Indonesian authorities, but that this evidence has been ignored by a judiciary that is under political pressure from the Spanish government to get rid of Firasat once and for all.
“Even if Indonesians do not punish me for death, how will I be protected from Muslims who consider me a blasphemer and an apostate? Will I be able to get a fair trial when the judges, prosecution, fake witnesses and lawyers, everybody will be a Muslim?” — Imran Firasat
Firasat said it was never his intention to provoke the Spanish government, but that he felt it was his duty to “warn of the dangers of not understanding or stopping what is known as Jihad.”
There have been a number of prognostications telling the writers’ many separate and often distinct predictions. These predictions span from gloom and doom to the thrills once we combine with our technological inventions enhancing our lives in remarkable ways. Then there is the possibility we will face threats due to the singularity from advanced artificial intelligent robots which will have surpassed us and begin to leap so far ahead of our own technological knowledge and abilities that we will become either their pets or a nuisance to be eradicated depending on who you ask. There are predictions on the political level where China becomes the new eight-hundred pound gorilla on the stage and the United States falls into a weak second class state in the shadows or China falls economically and the United States rebounds to Africa becoming the new European style power and Europe degrades into economic ruin even…
View original post 2,070 more words
Good morning. One day cock of the walk, and next a feather duster? The feelgood factor around the Autumn Statement in yesterday’s papers has turned somewhat sour.
“Osborne rattled by figures that expose plans for ‘colossal’ cuts” is the Guardian’s splash; “Osborne plan hides ‘colossal cuts’ ahead” the Scotsman’s. . “Osborne accused of creating ‘black hole” is the headline in our Business section and “Five years of cuts: It will be grotesque, warns think tank” is our take on the IFS estimates of the scale of fiscal retrenchment required if George Osborne’s spending targets are to be met.
Elsewhere, the row between the Conservatives and the BBC has turned acrimonious. “Tories at war with ‘biased BBC'” is our splash. “Tories Go To War With BBC Over Cuts” is the Mail’s. “Anyone who has to explain politics and make it interesting at that time of the morning is entitled to a little licence,” argues Andrew Sparrow over at the Guardian. (Or a handfluff of typos, say I.)
It has to be seen in “the wider context of BBC bias” our leader argues. “The licence fee is the same price for people of all political persuasions who wish to watch television – so it is appalling that the coverage they are compelled to finance should be so blatantly biased”.
The row will rumble on and will doubtless colour relations between the Corporation and the Conservatives both in the run-in and after the election. But it’s the Indy and the i that should really worry Downing Street and the Treasury. “Revealed: Osborne’s debt time bomb” is the Indy’s splash, and “Credit Card Nation” leads the i. The OBR’s reports reveal that an unprecedented level of personal debt underpin the deficit reduction plans. Even assuming a far looser level of deficit reduction than that outlined at the moment, we know that household debt and government borrowing are high and getting higher. As Fraser Nelson notes in his column, the era of low interest rates could extend for decades – and we simply don’t know what the consequences of that will be.
THE MAGNIFICENT 0.7
The House will vote on legislation to enshrine the 0.7% target into law today. It’s feared that Conservative backbenchers who are hostile to the law will talk out the Bill with a series of spurious amendments, Matt Holehouse reports. Among the amendments: that contributions to the EU budget and the welfare bill be counted as foreign aid. Labour say they will require the presence of at least 50 Coalition MPs in order to muster the 100-vote quorum necessary to break a filibuster on the law.
Nick Clegg’s absence from the Autumn Statement will hurt the Liberal Democrats, Jeremy Browne told a TPA-IEA fringe. “We should not run away from our record, because we will not get the credit and continue to get the blame,” Mr Browne said. We need to be “unambiguously associated with the Government that we are members of”, he continued. Georgia Graham has the story.
The inquiry into the handling of allegations of child sexual abuse is “not fit for purpose” a group of 24 child abuse victims and professionals have said in a letter seen by Jack Blanchard in the Mirror. Theresa May insists that the “once-in-a-lifetime” probe will continue as planned.
FANCY A THREEWAY?
Ukip have held the council ward of Aveley & Uplands in the Conservative-held constituency of Thurrock, which is shaping up to be a genuine three-way fight between Ukip’s Tim Aker, Labour’s Polly Billington and the incumbent, Jackie Doyle-Price. The Conservatives had come under fire for leaflets using Mr Aker’s full Turkish name of Timür Aker on leaflets.
JUMPING THE SHARK
I’ve been enjoying listening to “Polling Matters”, the podcast about – you guessed it – polling with pollster Keiran Pedley and Leo Barasi. Episodes so far have discussed the Green surge, the difficulties of polling Ukip, and the consequences – or lack thereof – of Ed Miliband’s personal ratings on Labour’s standing. I was the guest this week as we discussed the rise of marginal polling and its use to political debate. You can listen to all the episodes here.
Rising Labour stars Lisa Nandy and Rachel Reeves have both announced that are expecting children in April (Ms Nandy’s first) and June (Ms Reeves’ second). It’s a disaster for Ed Miliband, says Dan Hodges. (Not really. It’s the Liberal leader in Dan’s sights this morning.)
Jeremy Thorpe, the Liberal leader largely remembered for the scandal that ended his career, has died. Tim Stanley plays tribute here, and you can read his obituary here. Upon losing his seat in the 1979 election, Mr Thorpe quipped that the allegations against him had “hardly helped” his campaign, but it’s helped the Liberals keep some perspective in tough times. “At least no-one’s shot a dog yet,” one Liberal MP quipped during the last days of Charlie Kennedy’s leadership.
View original post 75 more words
(This op-ed by Geoffrey Alderman originally appeared in The Journal, a newspaper widely circulating in the north-east of England.)
On Tuesday 18 November two Palestinian-Islamic terrorists entered a synagogue in Jerusalem (the capital of Israel, the Jewish state) and, armed with an assortment of knives, cleavers and a gun began to hack and shoot to death as many Jews as they could. Eventually the murders were themselves gunned down. Whilst Israel buried its dead the evil deeds of the two Palestinians were celebrated by many throughout the Arab world. They were – Palestinian spokespersons declared – “martyrs” – the latest “heroes” in the 66-year-old Arab war against the nation-state of the Jews.
Who is responsible for this state of affairs, and in particular for the mindset that can result in a history of wholly indiscriminate attacks on Jews in Israel and beyond, launched from within the Arab world? On…
View original post 735 more words