Like the previous report on the subject of the impasse in the talks between Israel and the PLO published two days earlier, this one too signals the beginning of a departure from the promotion of the faux equivocal stance enabled by carefully selected omissions which has so far been adopted to describe to audiences the reasons for the breakdown in negotiations.
As we noted in relation to the previous article:
“The report goes on to quote and promote unnamed “correspondents”, providing no information which would enable audiences to assess the relevance or validity of the claim made by those anonymous sources.
“Correspondents say Mr Netanyahu’s action has dealt another blow to the faltering US-brokered peace process.” “
This latest article has…
View original post 741 more words