Humorous Dispassionate

.                .

Dad: Son, Buy Me a Soft Drink.

Me: Coke or Pepsi?

Dad: Coke.

Me: Diet or Regular?

Dad: Regular.

Me: Bottle or Can?

Dad: Bottle.

Me: 8oz or Liter?

Dad: Dammit, Just buy me water!

Me: Natural or Mineral?

Dad: Mineral!

Me: Cold or Hot?

Dad: I m Gonna Strike You With A Broom!

Me: Stick Broom or Soft Broom!

Dad: You  Animal!

Me: Cow or Pig?

Dad: Get The Hell Out Of Here!

Me: Now or Tomorrow?

Dad: Now!

Me: Your Gonna Accompany Me or Not?

Dad: I m Going To Kill You!

Me: Stab by a knife or Shot by gun ?

Dad: Shot By A Gun!

Me: Head or Stomach?


Me: Cockroach or Rat?

Dad: F*******ck Offffffffffffffffffff

View original post

Humorous Dispassionate

A doctor and a lawyer were talking at a party, but their conversation
was constantly interrupted by people describing their ailments and
asking the doctor for free medical advice.

After an hour of this, the exasperated doctor finally asked the lawyer,
What do you do to stop people from asking you for legal advice when
you’re out of the office?

I give it to them, replied the lawyer, and then I send them a bill.

The doctor was shocked, but agreed it was a good idea and decided
to give it a try.

The next day, still feeling slightly guilty, the doctor prepared the bills.
When he went to place them in his mailbox,
he found a bill from the lawyer!!

View original post

Ed Balls Cannels Churchill

MORNING BRIEFING – By Benedict Brogan (Daily Telegraph).

Ed Balls has tried a spot of subliminal messaging in his Guardian interview photo this morning. He poses by a copy of Martin Gilbert’s Churchill, leaning forward in his chair, mouth set. All that’s missing is the cigar. And he couples that with an account of how he sweated his way through his Grade 1 piano exam a few months ago (he passed, but without a merit). Ed Balls: shadow chancellor, would be leader, man of destiny, artist.

Westminster kremlinologists can amuse themselves wondering what Ed Miliband’s office will make of this pre-conference associative mischief. Especially as it comes with his plan for a zero-based budget review if Labour get back in. He wants all expenditure to be gone through line by line to justify government activity. The snag is he has already set exemptions – DfID, Health, preventative programmes (wide open to interpretation), and anything that can achieve cross party consensus. Sceptics will wonder how much a Labour chancellor would actually cut. And he doesn’t address the point some members of the shadow cabinet are beginning to mutter about, namely whether Labour should match Coalition spending plans beyond 2015. But as we prepare to head for Manchester this weekend, Mr Balls has played his first card in what will be an attempt next week to secure some economic credibility.

Harriet Harman, of course, has other ideas. She rather undermined Mr Balls’ economic plans in an interview with the Spectator in which she said:

“Our argument against the Tories is that the scale and pace of their deficit reduction is self-defeating and hurting the economy and therefore making less money available. So we have got a fundamental economic critique — we would not be signing up to doing the very thing we think is hurting the economy.”

Nothing if not consistent. Plenty of other conference plot lines are also coming nicely to the boil. The Sun reports that David Miliband will miss his brother’s speech. Ed, meanwhile, has had his phone confiscated and the number changed after the row over his texts with Vince Cable, the Times (£) reports.

Elsewhere in the Times (£), Philip Collins sets out the challenge the Labour Party face at their conference:

“The paradox for Labour is that the source of its popularity – the failure of the coalition to clear the deficit rapidly – is also its predicament. Behind the mumblings about the credibility of the leader and the austerity denial lurks the existential question of what it means to be Labour when the cash runs out.”


The Coalition have woken up to a couple of unhelpful stories from the other side of the Channel, quite aside from the financial collapse which is spooking the markets at home. The economic situation on the continent is dire, and as Jeremey Warner argues in today’s Telegraph, Spain may soon have no option but to leave the euro.

We report that Mr Cameron is planning to ‘claw-back’ powers from Brussels in around 20 different legislative areas, with the Mail putting the figure at around 100 powers. The move is understandable given that public faith in the European project is at an all time low, and the move is unlikely to meet heavy opposition from a Labour Party conscious about its prior record.

The question remains as to whether Mr Cameron will consider an in/out referendum. While the Mail reports that it is still on the table, we report that the Prime Minister said it is “not a priority”, during a radio interview on his visit to Brazil.

Even so, it is Europe landing the blows this morning. The Coalition’s plan for minimum alcohol pricing is in danger thanks to Brussels, as the Mail reports. EU officials have told the Scottish government to remove its 50p-a-unit minimum price as it is a restriction on trade. The restrictions had been anticipated to be brought in for England and Wales if the Scottish experiment was a success.

Meanwhile, the FT (£) reports that the French government are pushing to increase their stake in any BAE-EADS tie-up. The French currently hold a 15 per cent stake in EADS, which would be diluted to nine per cent under the proposed merger terms. However, they have reserved the right to buy the 7.5 per cent stake in EADS held by media company Lagardere, a move which would give them 13.5 per cent of any combined entity.

Berlin is rumoured to be considering making a similar move by compulsory purchasing Daimler’s stake in EADS. Combined, the French and German governments could hold 27 per cent of the new group. Britain has said it will not permit a deal where either government owns over nine per cent. Irrespective of the stake size, the question will now inevitably be asked as to why Britain is happy to sacrifice its golden share in BAE, but the continental governments are still left with a possible blocking minority in the new company.


Dave’s gay marriage proposals have drawn him plenty of flack from his own party, but Ed Miliband may yet outflank him and win the electoral fruits. In a video recorded for pressure group Out4Marriage, Mr Miliband said that he supported gay marriages in churches and other religious institutions.

Our leader calls Mr Miliband’s move “mischievous”, saying:

“Superficially, [Mr Miliband’s] proposal has the ring of reasonableness that is all opposition requires – why, he can ask, should couples not be allowed a religious wedding if there is a clergyman eager to perform it? It is Mr Cameron who is left in an awkward spot, forced to choose between defending the reforms as they stand and being outflanked by Mr Miliband, or accepting his rival’s suggestion and further enraging the plan’s opponents. But then, that is a dilemma he has brought entirely upon himself.”


Dave’s Letterman appearance gets three stars in the papers. The consensus seems to be that the Prime Minister left red-faced, but with little damage done. Many found it boring: “scintillating and sparkly might not be the words for the programme”, Quentin Letts writes in the Mail. Meanwhile the FT (£) considers Dave to have been a qualified success:

“This was the ‘good’ Cameron, as opposed to the ‘bad’ Cameron – an over-bearing, arrogant bully – who not infrequently emerges during Wednesday’s Prime Minister’s Questions.”

Would you have fared any better? You can take our Letterman style quiz here.


The Telegraph’s Mandrake column has followed up its scoop yesterday, on George Osborne, Michael Gove and Ed Vaizey making an afternoon trip to the opera, with another today. George and the boys will return to the Royal Opera House for the third and fourth operas in Wagner’s Ring Cycle.

The story has provoked mixed reactions. On Telegraph blogs, Damian Thompson is firmly of the view that “Wagner is more important than the wretched Lib Dems”. The Daily Mail, on the other hand, is furious. Its leader column thunders:

“David Cameron – who, according to his Old Etonian friend Charlie Brooks, once refused to take a call from President Obama until he had finished a tennis match – spent Wednesday making a twit of himself on an American TV show with three million viewers.

“Meanwhile, Chancellor George Osborne, Education Secretary Michael Gove and the arts minister Ed Vaizey took several hours off in the middle of the day enjoying free tickets to a prestigious production of Wagner’s Ring cycle at the Royal Opera House in London’s Covent Garden.

“Forgive the Mail for asking, but just who is in charge of the rattling train?”


Tory MPs are “hatching a plot” to have Andrew Mitchell fired, according to the Sun. Their reasoning is pretty straight-forward. One would-be rebel tells the paper:

“Andrew Mitchell has managed to turn us from the nasty party to the f***ing nasty party. He should be sacked.”

The rebels are planning to write to the chairman of the 1922 Committee demanding Mr Mitchell step down. Although there is no constitutional mechanism in the party for ensuring this happens, they hope to make his position impossible by weight of support. Watch out, Thrasher…


A good Dave chillaxing story has been hard to come by since the Prime Minister’s praise for the restorative properties of ‘Fruit Ninja’. Today serves up a corker – a Old Etonian friend of the Prime Minister who is embroiled in the phone hacking row, has said that the PM refused a call from Barack Obama so that he could finish a tennis match.

As we report, Charlie Brooks, husband of Rebekah Brooks, told the Racing Post:

“I played tennis with him at Chequers one day. I won the first set easily, then he won the second set, and then someone came up to him and said ‘er … Mr Obama is on the phone for you, Prime Minister’.

“I thought ‘okay, we’ll have to leave it there’. But he said ‘I think we’ve got time for a third set – tell Mr Obama I’ll ring him back’. He obviously thought he had me on the ropes. And I beat him two sets to one.”


Strictly Come Dancing contestant turned cabinet minister Vince Cable has a tendency to fall asleep during meetings, the Mail reports. The 69-year-old Business Secretary would find it hard to take over the leadership as he “struggles to stay awake all day as it is”, say Clegg loyalists, clearly riled by Vince’s self-promotion at the party conference.


And finally…Gordon Brown may have slipped from public life in Britain, but the U.N. have recently appointed him as global special envoy for education. For this reason he was in New York to address a crowd of journalists yesterday. Unfortunately, the crowd consisted of a solitary Telegraph reporter.

Our report details the rather sad ending:

“As the former Prime Minister stood in the background, a message was played on the loudspeaker reminding the media that Mr Brown was due to speak.

“At about 4.20pm another message was played over the public address system informing the media that Mr Brown’s press conference was cancelled.”


As England take a thrashing in their Twenty20 World Cup cricket match against the West Indies in Sri Lanka, the reason becomes apparent. Tim Loughton has commandeered half the squad as dinner companions:

@timloughton “Delighted 2 host tribute dinner 4 Matt Prior in Commons tonight with Andrew Strauss + Alastair Cook.”


In The Telegraph

Fraser Nelson – Won’t George Osborne learn the lesson? Wealth taxes simply don’t work

Damian Reece – Germany on firm footing as rest of eurozone sinks

Jeremey Warner – Spain must leave the euro

Mark Martins – America’s best weapons are law and justice

Best of the rest

Philip Collins in The Times (£) – Labour needs real cuts as well as real ideas

Samuel Brittan in the FT (£) – A liberal case for scepticism of the EU

Mary Deievsky in The Independent – Cameron can’t do a Boris – and shouldn’t try

Polly Toynbee in The Guardian – Labour must face this fact – it may be better in coalition


Today: David Cameron continues his visit to Brazil. #

08:50 am: FSA managing director Martin Wheatley gives speech on his recommendations for reforming the Libor system.

On the button as always.

PA Pundits - International

By Alan Caruba ~

On June 20, 1936, Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia addressed the League of Nations following the annexation of his nation by Italy the previous year, after Mussolini’s army had invaded. Both nations were members of the League. It condemned the invasion and had imposed economic sanctions that were weak and ignored by its members.

In the wake of having been driven from Ethiopia, Selassie warned the League’s assembled diplomats “It is us today. It will be you tomorrow.”

World War II would begin three years later when Nazi Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939.

There are lessons to be drawn from history if one is inclined to learn history. On Thursday, September 27, just as he has for the last few years, Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Natanyahu again addressed the General Assembly of the United Nations and again warned that time was running out for a…

View original post 468 more words

Confessions of an Apple Junkie

This morning, I woke up singing this song.


Woke up singing.

It’s not that happens often.

Fall is here (well it’s been here “officially” since last Saturday..but that’s not the point!)

I hope you like this as much as I do..and if this gets stuck in anyone’s head..I cannot take responsibility 😀

Side Note: Lyrics change

I’d be safe and warm if I was in LA to I’d appreciate the be in Lisbon one day

*he he*

View original post

Humorous Dispassionate

The man looked a little worried when the psychiatrist came in to administer
his annual physical, so the first thing the psychiatrist did was to ask whether
anything was troubling him.

Well, to tell the truth, Doc, yes, answered the patient. You see, I seem to be
getting forgetful. I’m never sure I can remember where I put the car, or who
is my wife or whether I answered a letter, or where I’m going, or what it is I’m
going to do once I get there – if I get there; so I really need your help.
What can I do?

The psychiatrist mused for a moment, then answered in his kindest tones,

Pay me in advance !!

View original post

Humorous Dispassionate

A man comes home from work and finds his wife admiring her breasts
in the mirror.

He asks, What are you doing?

She replies, I went to the doctor today, and he told me that I have the
breasts of a 25 year old.

The husband retorts, Well, what did he say about your 50 year old ass?

She replies, Frankly dear, your name never came up !

Then the Fight Started !!

View original post

Won’t George Osborne learn the lesson? Wealth taxes simply don’t work

For once, Boris Johnson is wrong. He loathes Nick Clegg’s proposed mansion tax, rightly saying it would mainly hit London and that it is “crazy” to attack the engine of Britain’s economic recovery. But to dismiss the idea as a “non-starter” suggests that someone has not been telling the Mayor of London the whole truth. It is not just being taken seriously, but has been fully costed and approved by George Osborne. It was only pulled from the most recent Budget at the last minute. It still lurks on the policy runway, waiting to be cleared for take-off.

The Chancellor may agree that a mansion tax is a daft idea, but the political horse-trading of coalition government makes it possible for half-baked policies to become the law of the land. The Lib Dems wanted a substantial win in the Budget, and so Osborne grudgingly agreed to slap another two extra bands on to the council tax alphabet – they could call it a mansion tax if they wanted. In return, Clegg consented to lowering the top rate of tax from 50p to 40p (though he would later pretend to be appalled at the very thought). This Osborne-Clegg tax pact was vetoed by David Cameron, who quailed at the prospect of imposing new taxes on London just before a mayoral election.


Spain must leave the euro

Mario Draghi’s promise to do “whatever it takes” to save the euro never did look like inducing any more than a temporary lull in the storm; still less did the German Constitutional Court’s thumbs up to the European bail-out fund and the trouncing that eurosceptic parties received in the Dutch election.

Yet the eurozone crisis has sparked back into life more swiftly than even I would have anticipated, with the epicentre returning to a fast-shrinking Spanish economy. Political and economic developments are once more threatening to combine into an uncontrollable firestorm.

To understand why, it is first necessary to explode some myths about the nature of the eurozone debt crisis. This is not at root either an isolated banking crisis or indeed a fiscal one, though that’s how public policy in Europe attempts to define it.